OpenModel vs RunAPI

If you are comparing AI API proxies for Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, or Kimi, this head-to-head focuses on the buying decision: model-group pricing, platform operations, image-model coverage, signup credit, invoicing, public status monitoring, and migration effort.

Reviewed August 13, 2026. Facts reflect the latest OpenModel and RunAPI records in CCNavX; model availability, billing groups, and prices can change.

OpenModel is the Sub2API-based option in this comparison. Its recorded strengths are a larger model list, Kimi and Codex-specific entries, failover, request logs, usage analytics, and per-key controls; its lowest recorded reference ratio is about 10% and no public status page is recorded.

Lowest reference discount
About 10% of official price Roughly 90% below official price
Minimum top-up
$5
Supported models
30 models
Monthly visits
271.21K (2026-07)
Visit website

RunAPI is the New API-based option in this comparison. It records the lower minimum reference ratio at about 7.4%, signup credit, enterprise invoicing, and a public status page, while its profile has fewer models and different image-model coverage.

Lowest reference discount
About 7.4% of official price Roughly 93% below official price
Minimum top-up
$5
Supported models
28 models
Monthly visits
43.78K (2026-07)
Visit website

OpenModel or RunAPI: which should you choose?

Choose OpenModel when its broader recorded model list, Kimi and Codex-specific entries, failover, request logs, and per-key usage controls matter more. Choose RunAPI when its lower published reference ratio, signup credit, recorded enterprise invoicing, and public status page matter more. Both record a $5 minimum top-up, so compare the exact model group rather than the entry amount alone.

OpenModel vs RunAPI pricing and minimum top-up

Both profiles use the same lowest-published-price ratio, so the headline reference discounts are comparable: OpenModel starts at about 10% of official API pricing, while RunAPI starts at about 7.4%. That gives RunAPI the lower recorded minimum ratio, but it does not establish that every RunAPI model is cheaper. OpenModel records GPT from about 10%, Claude from 40%, and Gemini from 90% of official pricing. RunAPI records GPT and Codex from about 7.4%, Claude from about 11.7%, and Gemini from 21%, using named billing groups for each family. Both require a $5 minimum top-up. Confirm the selected model, billing group, and effective rate after signing in, then send a small paid request before moving normal traffic.

OpenModel vs RunAPI: AI API proxy pricing and models
Comparison item OpenModel logo OpenModel RunAPI logo RunAPI
Lowest reference discount About 10% of official priceRoughly 90% below official price About 7.4% of official priceRoughly 93% below official price
Minimum top-up $5 $5
Supported models 30 models 28 models
Payment methods
Monthly visits 271.21K (2026-07) 43.78K (2026-07)
Domain age 7y 11m 11d 8m 5d
Status page
Built with Sub2API New API

Based on each provider's lowest published price ratio. Actual pricing varies by model, account group, and promotion.

Models supported by OpenModel and RunAPI

The two profiles share 23 recorded model IDs across Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, and Kimi. OpenModel records 30 models; its seven profile-specific entries are Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5.3 Codex, GPT-5.4 Pro, Codex Auto Review, Kimi K2.5, Kimi K2.6, and Kimi K2.7 Code. RunAPI records 28 models; its five profile-specific entries are GPT Image 2, two additional Gemini preview or lite models, Grok 4.1 Fast, and Grok Imagine Image. A model ID in a profile does not prove identical context limits, streaming, tool use, or availability. Match the exact ID and protocol required by the client before switching.

Both (23)

Claude 8

  • claude-fable-5
  • claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
  • claude-opus-4-6
  • claude-opus-4-7
  • claude-opus-4-8
  • claude-opus-5
  • claude-sonnet-4-6
  • claude-sonnet-5

GPT / Codex 6

  • gpt-5.4
  • gpt-5.4-mini
  • gpt-5.5
  • gpt-5.6-luna
  • gpt-5.6-sol
  • gpt-5.6-terra

Gemini 5

  • gemini-3-flash-preview
  • gemini-3.1-pro-preview
  • gemini-3.5-flash
  • gemini-3.5-flash-lite
  • gemini-3.6-flash

Grok 1

  • grok-4.5

DeepSeek 2

  • deepseek-v4-flash
  • deepseek-v4-pro

Kimi 1

  • kimi-k3

OpenModel only (7)

Claude 1

  • claude-sonnet-4-5

GPT / Codex 3

  • codex-auto-review
  • gpt-5.3-codex
  • gpt-5.4-pro

Kimi 3

  • kimi-k2.5
  • kimi-k2.6
  • kimi-k2.7-code

RunAPI only (5)

GPT / Codex 1

  • gpt-image-2

Gemini 2

  • gemini-3-pro-preview
  • gemini-3.1-flash-lite

Grok 2

  • grok-4.1-fast
  • grok-imagine-image

Payment methods, status monitoring, and API setup

Both profiles record Alipay, Visa, Mastercard, and American Express. OpenModel additionally records Stripe and Google Pay, while RunAPI records Creem. OpenModel documents gateway failover, request logs, usage analytics, and API-key quotas; no independent public status page or confirmed invoice type is recorded in its current profile. RunAPI records signup credit, enterprise invoicing, and a public status page, but the exact invoice arrangement should still be confirmed with sales. OpenModel uses Sub2API and RunAPI uses New API; the platform name and traffic figures do not prove speed or reliability. Configure a separate API key and test billing, streaming, tool calls, and failover behavior before migration.

Choose OpenModel when

  • You need OpenModel's recorded Kimi K2.5, Kimi K2.6, Kimi K2.7 Code, GPT-5.3 Codex, GPT-5.4 Pro, or Codex Auto Review.
  • Per-key quotas, request logs, usage analytics, and gateway-level failover are part of your workflow.
  • Stripe or Google Pay is required for top-ups.

Choose RunAPI when

  • You want the lower published reference ratio, starting at about 7.4% of official API pricing.
  • A signup credit and public status page are useful before committing production traffic.
  • You need GPT Image 2, Grok Imagine Image, or recorded enterprise invoicing.

Switching between OpenModel and RunAPI

  • Both services expose compatible APIs, but their Base URLs, API keys, model IDs, and billing groups are provider-specific; replace each value explicitly.
  • Keep the previous configuration available until a low-value request confirms authentication, billing, streaming, tool calls, and the selected model route.

Common questions

Is OpenModel or RunAPI cheaper? +

RunAPI has the lower recorded minimum reference ratio at about 7.4% of official API pricing, compared with OpenModel at about 10%. These are each provider's lowest published ratios, not a guarantee for every model. Compare the exact Claude, GPT, Gemini, or other model group you plan to use.

Which provider has the lower minimum top-up? +

They are tied in the current profiles: both OpenModel and RunAPI record a $5 minimum top-up. RunAPI also records a small signup credit, while no trial credit is recorded for OpenModel.

Which is better for Codex, Claude Code, or image models? +

OpenModel is the better first check for its recorded GPT-5.3 Codex, GPT-5.4 Pro, Codex Auto Review, and Kimi entries. RunAPI is the better first check for GPT Image 2, Grok Imagine Image, and its additional Gemini preview or lite entries. Confirm the exact model ID and protocol before switching.

Which is better for a development team? +

OpenModel is the clearer fit when per-key controls, request logs, usage analytics, and gateway failover matter. RunAPI is the clearer fit when a public status page, signup credit, and recorded enterprise invoicing matter. Neither profile alone proves a contractual SLA, so procurement requirements still need direct confirmation.

Can I switch between OpenModel and RunAPI without changing my client? +

A compatible client may work with both, but the Base URL, API key, model ID, protocol, and billing group can differ. Change those values explicitly and test a small request before moving normal traffic.