PackyAPI vs APIKey

PackyAPI and APIKey both cover Claude, GPT, Grok, and Kimi models, and both accept WeChat Pay and Alipay. The practical differences are credit cost, minimum top-up, provider-specific models, USDT support, and access to a public status page.

Reviewed August 3, 2026. Facts reflect the latest provider records available in CCNavX; pricing and model coverage can change.

PackyAPI provides usage-based large-model API access for Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI models, with a ¥50 minimum top-up; from June, new personal payments only support overseas invoices, while mainland China tax invoices require corporate public-account payment.

Price metric
¥0.30 / $1 credit
Minimum top-up
¥50
Supported models
36 models
Monthly visits
533.86K (2026-07)
Visit provider

APIKey is a universal AI gateway for developers and teams, with Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Alipay, WeChat Pay, USDT, public pricing, multilingual support, and referral rebates.

Price metric
¥0.60 / $1 credit
Minimum top-up
¥30
Supported models
16 models
Monthly visits
224.58K (2026-07)
Visit provider

PackyAPI or APIKey: which should you choose?

Choose PackyAPI when lower recorded credit cost, broader recorded model coverage, and a public status page matter more. Choose APIKey when a lower minimum top-up and USDT support matter more. The price figures use the same recorded ¥ per $1 credit metric for this pair, but they are not a promise of future billing.

PackyAPI vs APIKey pricing and minimum top-up

PackyAPI and APIKey use the same recorded usage-credit metric in this comparison, which makes the headline prices directly comparable: PackyAPI is listed at about ¥0.30 per $1 credit and APIKey at about ¥0.60. PackyAPI therefore has the lower recorded conversion cost, while APIKey asks for less money upfront with a ¥30 minimum top-up instead of ¥50. Neither figure is a universal per-model price. Account groups, promotions, and model multipliers can change the effective bill, so confirm the selected model's rate after signing in and run a small paid request before moving production traffic.

PackyAPI vs APIKey: which AI API proxy fits you?
Provider PackyAPI logo PackyAPI APIKey logo APIKey
Price metric ¥0.30 / $1 credit ¥0.60 / $1 credit
Minimum top-up ¥50 ¥30
Supported models 36 models 16 models
Payment methods
Monthly visits 533.86K (2026-07) 224.58K (2026-07)
Domain age 9m 25d 4m 29d
Status page
Built with PackyMe Sub2API

Models supported by PackyAPI and APIKey

The two profiles share 10 recorded model IDs across Claude, GPT, Grok, and Kimi. PackyAPI currently lists 36 models, including a Gemini range, more GPT and Codex variants, additional Claude versions, and an image model. APIKey lists 16 models and has several IDs not recorded for PackyAPI, including Claude Opus 5, Claude Haiku 4.5, the GPT-5.6 Sol and Terra variants, and DeepSeek V4 Pro and Flash. A longer list does not guarantee identical context windows, tool use, streaming, or availability. Match the exact model ID required by your client, then verify one real request instead of choosing from the model count alone.

Both (10)

Claude 5

  • claude-opus-4-6
  • claude-opus-4-7
  • claude-opus-4-8
  • claude-sonnet-4-6
  • claude-sonnet-5

GPT / Codex 3

  • gpt-5.3-codex
  • gpt-5.4
  • gpt-5.5

Grok 1

  • grok-4.5

Kimi 1

  • kimi-k3

PackyAPI only (26)

Claude 5

  • claude-fable-5
  • claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
  • claude-opus-4-1-20250805
  • claude-opus-4-5-20251101
  • claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929

GPT / Codex 11

  • gpt-5.3-codex-high
  • gpt-5.3-codex-low
  • gpt-5.3-codex-medium
  • gpt-5.3-codex-xhigh
  • gpt-5.4-high
  • gpt-5.4-low
  • gpt-5.4-medium
  • gpt-5.4-mini
  • gpt-5.4-pro
  • gpt-5.4-xhigh
  • gpt-image-2

Gemini 10

  • gemini-2.5-flash
  • gemini-2.5-flash-image
  • gemini-2.5-flash-thinking
  • gemini-2.5-pro
  • gemini-3-flash-preview
  • gemini-3-pro-image-preview
  • gemini-3.1-flash-image-preview
  • gemini-3.1-pro-preview
  • gemini-3.5-flash-lite
  • gemini-3.6-flash

APIKey only (6)

Claude 2

  • claude-haiku-4-5
  • claude-opus-5

GPT / Codex 2

  • gpt-5.6-sol
  • gpt-5.6-terra

DeepSeek 2

  • deepseek-v4-flash
  • deepseek-v4-pro

Payment methods, status monitoring, and API setup

Both providers record WeChat Pay, Alipay, Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, and Cash App Pay. APIKey additionally records USDT, USDC, BNB, ETH, TRX, SOL, and Stripe. PackyAPI has a public status page in the current profile; no public APIKey status page is recorded, which means incident checks may depend more on its own support channels. The profiles use different platform stacks—PackyMe for PackyAPI and Sub2API for APIKey—but the stack name alone does not establish reliability or speed. Before switching, copy the current Base URL and model ID from the provider profile, use a separate API key, and test billing, streaming, and tool calls with low-value traffic.

Choose PackyAPI when

  • You want the lower recorded usage-credit conversion: about ¥0.30 per $1 credit.
  • You need the broader recorded model list across Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI.
  • A public status page is useful for checking incidents before troubleshooting.

Choose APIKey when

  • You want to start with a lower recorded minimum top-up of ¥30.
  • USDT is a required payment option for your workflow.
  • You prefer a Sub2API-based provider profile and do not need the PackyAPI-only models.

Switching between PackyAPI and APIKey

  • Both profiles expose OpenAI-compatible API access points, but copy the endpoint and model ID from the selected provider profile before changing a client.
  • Keep the old Base URL available until a small test request succeeds and the billing group is confirmed.

Common questions

Which provider is cheaper? +

For the recorded usage-credit metric, PackyAPI is lower at about ¥0.30 per $1 credit versus APIKey at about ¥0.60. That conclusion applies only to this metric and does not guarantee the cost of every model or account group.

Which provider has the lower minimum top-up? +

APIKey is recorded at ¥30, while PackyAPI is recorded at ¥50.

Do they support the same models? +

They share a subset of Claude, GPT, Grok, and Kimi entries, but each profile also has provider-specific model IDs. Check the model coverage section before switching.

Is PackyAPI or APIKey better for Claude Code? +

Neither profile alone proves complete Claude Code compatibility for every model. PackyAPI records a broader Claude model list, while APIKey has a lower minimum top-up and several Claude IDs not recorded for PackyAPI. Confirm the exact Claude model ID and endpoint, then test streaming and tool use before choosing.

Can I switch between PackyAPI and APIKey without changing my client? +

An OpenAI-compatible client may work with both, but the Base URL, API key, model ID, and billing group are provider-specific. Change those values explicitly, keep the previous configuration available, and send a small test request before moving normal traffic.